|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2015)04-0076-07 |
| |
|
论反垄断法上共同支配地位协调行为的认定要素——以欧盟为例 |
| |
曾晶 |
| |
|
（华东政法大学经济法学院,上海, 201620） |
| |
| 摘 要： 在经营者集中反垄断法控制中，要判定经营者拥有共同支配地位，关键是看该集中能否导致经营者们达成并维持协调行为。而这主要应从经营者之间的反复相互作用、贴现因素对协调行为的影响、经营者之间能否建立可靠的惩罚报复机制，以及市场透明度高低与形成或维持协调性均衡之间的关系等方面来考察与分析。我国在反垄断法的实践中，尚未完全准确地掌握这一分析方法与套路，今后应借鉴欧美发达国家的成熟经验与做法，以促进反垄断法对经营者集中的有效规制。 |
| |
| 关键词： 共同支配地位；协调行为；贴现；惩罚报复机制；市场透明度 |
| |
|
| |
The identified elements of collective dominance and coordinated behavior in anti-monopoly law: taking EU as an example |
| |
ZENG Jing |
| |
（School of Economic Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620, China） |
| |
| Abstract: In the anti-monopoly law of concentration control, the key to judge whether an undertaker has the collective dominant position, is to see whether the concentration could lead all the undertakers to achieve and maintain the coordinated behavior. This mainly comes from the undertakers’ repeated interaction, the influence of discount factor on coordinated behavior, the reliable punishment retaliation mechanisms among the undertakers, and the relationship between market transparency and maintaining the coordinated behavior. In the practice of anti-monopoly law, our country has not fully and accurately grasped the analyzing methods and routines, so we should learn from the mature experience and practice of the developed countries in Europe and America in order to promote the anti-monopoly law in regulating concentration effectively. |
| |
Key words: collective dominance; coordinated behavior; discount; punishment retaliation mechanism; market transparency |
| |
|
