自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
 

中南大学学报(社会科学版)
ZHONGNAN DAXUE XUEBAO(SHEHUI KEXUE BAN)

2013年08月第19卷第4期
   
本文已被:浏览2448次    下载1160次   
文章编号:1672-3104(2013)04-0138-05
 
古希腊智者派“怀疑论”与庄子怀疑论比较分析
 
方熹,张能
 
(云南师范大学云南华文学院,云南昆明,650092;同济大学人文学院,上海,200092)
 
摘  要: 古希腊智者“怀疑论”从空洞的虚无表征出自身消极寂灭的形态,由于在单纯地消灭中未曾知道“单纯地消灭”并未割断消灭后新的产生这一事实性,无疑最后也滑向虚无的深渊;庄子的怀疑论表现出可知性中的不彻底性,即认为世界是可以认识的,但因个体的有限性而独断世界的不可知性,同时在相对的消逝中警惕着虚无化自身的侵袭,并在相对条件的消逝中来成其“道”本身,最后在精神气魄上做到了淡然与超脱。
 
关键词: 古希腊智者派;庄子;存在;尺度;境界;怀疑;差异
 
 
A contrast analysis of Ancient Greek sophists “Scepticism” and Chuang-tzu’s skepticism
 
FANG Xi,ZHANG Neng
 
(Yunnan College of Chinese Language and Culture, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650092, China;
Philosophical Faculty of Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
 
Abstract: Ancient Greek Sophists “Scepticism” was out of their negative Quietus morphology from empty nothingness characterization, due to destroying simply, without knowing that “simply destruction” did not cut off after the elimination of the new generation of this fact. There is no doubt that it also slid into the abyss of nothingness. On the other hand Chuang-tzu’s skepticism exhibited thoroughly unknown in the world, which means the world can be understood, but because of the limitation of individual and arbitrary of the unknown world, and at the same time, in the relative passing wary of nihility attacks itself, the relative condition goes to the “Tao” itself. Finally, it was detached and indifferently in the spirit.
 
Key words: ancient Greek sophists; existence; scale; realm; doubt; difference
 
 
版权所有:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部 
地 址:湖南省长沙市岳麓区麓山南路932号     邮编: 410083
电 话: 0731-88830141
电子邮箱: znsk@csu.edu.cn 湘ICP备09001153号-4