|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2010)05-0040-07 |
| |
|
论案件事实的定性原则
——以盗窃与抢夺、抢劫三个概念的界限为例 |
| |
聂长建，李国强 |
| |
|
（中南民族大学法学院，湖北武汉，430073；光山县人民法院，河南光山，465400） |
| |
| 摘 要： 法律上的概念种类总是有限的，而它所涵摄的案件事实的种类是无限的，一个法律概念要涵摄多个案件事实。案件事实离此概念越远，就离彼概念越近，直至其与彼概念的距离短于与此概念的距离，那么它就涵摄于彼概念而非此概念。概念是对事物本质的反映，对案件事实的定性不能从法律概念的字面表述和案件事实的现象的关联度来判断，而应该从法律概念的本质和案件事实的本质的关联度来判断。对案件事实是否属于盗窃罪、抢夺罪或抢劫罪的定性，也要坚持这一原则，才能定性准确。 |
| |
| 关键词： 案件事实；定性原则；盗窃罪；抢夺罪；抢劫罪 |
| |
|
| |
On principles of determining the nature to the facts of case |
| |
NIE Changjian, LI Guoqiang |
| |
（Law Scool of Zhongnan Minzu University, Wuhan 430073, China;
People’s Court of Guangshan County, Guangshan 465400, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The sorts of conceptions in law are limited, while the sorts of facts of cases it contains are limitless, and a legal conception contains many facts of cases. If a case fact is farther from this conception, then it is nearer to that conception, until it is shorter from that conception than this conception, then it contains that conception instead of this conception. Conception is the reflection of the essence, to determine the nature of case fact, we should judge from the relationship between the essence of legal conception and the essence of case facts instead of the relationship between the literal depiction of legal conception and phenomenon, we should stick to this principle to determine whether the facts of case belong to theft, plunder or robbing. |
| |
Key words: facts of a case; principle of determine the nature; crime of theft; crime of plunder; crime of robbing |
| |
|
