|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2010)05-0005-06 |
| |
|
论罗尔斯对古典契约论方法的创新性继承 |
| |
张卫明，李建华 |
| |
|
（中南大学应用伦理学研究中心，湖南 长沙，410083） |
| |
| 摘 要： 古典契约论者以人性论、自然权利和自然法假设为方法论前提构建自然状态理论模型，他们借助历史事实或逻辑思维，以“国家是如何产生”等为理论目的，历时态地展开了国家合法性的论证。当代契约论者罗尔斯继承这一假设构建方法，创新性地把它当作是获得社会正义原则的一种纯粹正义程序，并在契约的逻辑起点、契约订立的动因、契约推理的根据等方面对之进行了修正和批判，使之上升到一种更为抽象的水平。 |
| |
| 关键词： 契约论；罗尔斯；人性论；自然权利；自然法；社会正义原则 |
| |
|
| |
The innovative inheritance on classical contract theory of Rawls |
| |
ZHANG Weiming, LI Jianhua |
| |
（Research Center for Applied Ethics in Central South University, Changsha 410083, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The advocators of classical contract theory construct the natural theoretical model based on methodology, including the hypotheses of humanity, natural right and natural law. They persevere in demonstrating the legitimacy of country for the theoretical purpose of “how a country comes into being” by historical facts or logical thoughts. Rawls, the advocator of contemporary contract theory, inherits the hypothesis construction method which has regarded as a kind of pure procedure of justice. Moreover, the amendment and criticism on the logical foundation of contract, motivation of contract making and source of contract inference make it—the hypothesis construction method more abstract. |
| |
Key words: contract theory; John Rawls; humanity theory; natural right; natural law; principle of social justice |
| |
|
