|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2010)04-0045-05 |
| |
|
诉讼欺诈行为的性质认定与出路探寻 |
| |
陈伟 |
| |
|
（西南政法大学法学院，重庆，401120） |
| |
| 摘 要： 理论界对诉讼欺诈侵财行为的性质认定存在着较大差异的学术见解。利用司法公权力获得非正当利益的诉讼欺诈行为严重脱逸了社会相当性，具有纳入犯罪圈进行刑罚谴责及其否定性评价的正当理由。诉讼欺诈行为符合诈骗行为的内在结构模型，但是在规范刑法学上，把诉讼欺诈行为按照诈骗罪论处存在诸多障碍，这决定了在刑法分则中设立“诉讼欺诈罪”是我们的理性选择与最终出路。 |
| |
| 关键词： 诉讼欺诈；诈骗罪；三角诈骗；诉讼欺诈罪 |
| |
|
| |
On the nature and outlet of litigation fraud |
| |
CHEN Wei |
| |
（Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China） |
| |
| Abstract: There are some disputes on the litigation fraud in academic circles. The litigation fraud action that actor achieves unlawful interest by misusing judicial power oversteps social tolerance, which should brought into crime circle and attained penalty. Although litigation fraud accords with the model of dupery crime, the action of litigation fraud can not be revolved according to dupery crime because of lots of difficulties in the criminal law, which decides that we shall constitute the crime of litigation fraud as our rational choice and ultimate outlet. |
| |
Key words: litigation fraud; dupery crime; triangle fraud; crime of litigation fraud |
| |
|
