|
| 文章编号：1672-104(2003)02-177-5 |
| |
|
经理越权代表行为的法律后果与责任 |
| |
许光耀, 舒红 |
| |
|
（中南大学法学院，湖南长沙，410083） |
| |
| 摘 要： 如何限制公司经理越权代表公司的行为，控制经理阶层权力的扩张，是现代公司法普遍关注的问题，它要求必须首先明确经理权的概念及其性质。作者在比较分析了大陆法系与英美法系的观点之后，认为经理权是一种代理权，其实质在于经理对外代表公司的代表权能。在此基础上，针对经理越权行为的各种情形，讨论其法律后果及经理应当承担的法律责任。公司内部对于经理权限的限制，对善意第三人没有约束力，公司应对第三人承担责任；如经理超越了法律对其权限的限制，则第三人不能以善意为由要求公司承担责任。文章最后还分析了中国相关立法的现状及其完善方式。 |
| |
| 关键词： 经理权; 公司; 经理; 越权代表行为 |
| |
|
| |
On the legal effect and liability
of the ultra vires act of manager |
| |
XU Guang-ao,SHU Hong |
| |
（Law School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Most modern company legislations pay much attention to the ways based on the conception and nature of manager′s right to restrict managers′ ultra vires acts, and to control the extension of the power of manager stratum . After a comparative study on the relevant opinions of Anglo-Amercian and continental law system, the authors conclude that manager′s right is a kind of agent right, whose core is the right to represent the company in external relationship. Then the authors focus on the legal effects and relative legal liabilities caused by various ultra vires acts, and make some suggestions as to the improvement of the relevant legislation of China. |
| |
Key words: Manager′s right; company; manager; ultra vires act |
| |
|
|
