|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2004)04-0501-06 |
| |
|
反训所指的历时性考察 |
| |
夏凤梅 |
| |
|
（浙江大学汉语史研究中心,浙江杭州,310028） |
| |
| 摘 要： 反训所指的来源,主要是晋至1711年间《尔雅》《方言》中有关词条的郭璞注及其再注释。在其后的发展过程中,关于反训所指的认定不断地出现分歧意见,以致于引起争论。解决这些争论的途径是:分清不同来源、不同性质的所指,站在当代语言学的高度对其进行科学的说明。 |
| |
| 关键词： 反训;所指;历时性 |
| |
|
| |
The historic observation of the references interpreted by antonyms |
| |
XIA Feng-mei |
| |
（Center for Studies of History of Chinese Language, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The origins of references interpreted by antonyms are mainly aboutwords interpreted by Guo Pu in ERYA and FANG YAN from the Jin Dynastytothe yearof 1771. The identification on references interpreted by antonyms lies in differentopinions which lead to argument. The way to solve the problem is to distinguish the different origins and references, and then scientifically illustrate them from the perspective of contemporary linguistics. |
| |
Key words: references; interpreted by antonyms; historic |
| |
|
